Active Teaching Community Forum
May 21, 2012, 11:42:03 PM *
Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.

Login with username, password and session length
News:
 
   Home   Help Search Calendar Login Register  
Pages: [1]   Go Down
  Print  
Author Topic: Student Conception: Friction and inertia  (Read 394 times)
0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.
admin
Administrator
Full Member
*****

Applause received: 0
Offline Offline

Posts: 240


« on: July 15, 2005, 12:03:13 PM »

Seed a discussion with a review of literature for misconceptions (Scott and Matt’s research)
Logged
Matt Anthes-Washburn
Administrator
Full Member
*****

Applause received: 2
Offline Offline

Posts: 177


Matt Anthes-Washburn


WWW
« Reply #1 on: July 25, 2005, 09:47:41 AM »

Student Conception: Friction and inertia
Students may confound friction with inertia.

Identifiers
Students may say that the force required to accelerate an object at rest is working against friction, not inertia.
(Atlas of Science Literacy (2001), American Association for the Advancement of Science, Project 2061. pp.62-63) (Jung et al., 1981; Brown & Clement, 1992)

Confounding Experiences
Pushing a massive object across a frictional surface makes it difficult to differentiate what force is required to accelerate an object and what force is required to overcome friction.  It is difficult to create a frictionless environment on earth.

Formative Assessment Question
Have students draw a free body diagram indicating the forces acting on the object.  Ask the students to calculate the force balance and determine what force would cause acceleration. 

Interventions
Pay particular attention to the case where the object moves with constant speed when a constant force is applied.  Students may need some help determining when they are pulling an object with constant speed.  They will also need to work through the example to understand why constant horizontal speed can be accurately correlated with constant force.  PTG #4 describes a cross-country skier in this situation. A constant force is applied to counter friction and no acceleration occurs.
Logged

Matthew Anthes-Washburn
Teacher, Physics
Denver East High School
Ken Dugan
Field Test
Newbie
*

Applause received: 0
Offline Offline

Posts: 6



« Reply #2 on: July 27, 2005, 07:38:54 AM »

The activity involves pulling different shoes across the desk or floor. perhaps giving the students similar materials to test to get a 'baseline' of data to make further comparisons would be . that way they could see that the Mu does not change unless the surfasces are changed.
Logged
Janie Martin
Field Test
Newbie
*

Applause received: 0
Offline Offline

Posts: 18


Janie


« Reply #3 on: July 27, 2005, 07:50:30 AM »

We wrapped a brick with different materials ( such as waxed paper, foil, felt etc) to compare the mu of different things but kept the mass constant.
Logged
Janie Martin
Field Test
Newbie
*

Applause received: 0
Offline Offline

Posts: 18


Janie


« Reply #4 on: July 27, 2005, 07:57:18 AM »

The activity involves pulling different shoes across the desk or floor. perhaps giving the students similar materials to test to get a 'baseline' of data to make further comparisons would be . that way they could see that the Mu does not change unless the surfasces are changed.
This is verry do-able because all you need are shoes and spring scales, good activity.
Logged
Janie Martin
Field Test
Newbie
*

Applause received: 0
Offline Offline

Posts: 18


Janie


« Reply #5 on: July 27, 2005, 09:28:53 AM »

ok heres something for you
« Last Edit: July 27, 2005, 09:30:24 AM by Janie Martin » Logged
Pages: [1]   Go Up
  Print  
 
Jump to:  


Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.9 | SMF © 2006-2009, Simple Machines LLC Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!